Jet Lens vs. Legacy Platforms
See how structured QA and operational workflows in one platform compare to traditional systems
Why Choose Jet Lens Over Legacy Systems?
Traditional maintenance management systems can't keep up with modern aviation demands. See how Jet Lens transforms every aspect of your operations.
Quality Traceability
Jet Lens
- Discrepancies with evidence and status tracking
- Corrective actions linked to discrepancies
- Status workflow from open to closure
- Evidence file attachments
Centralized quality tracking with full traceability
Legacy Systems
- Scattered documentation
- Manual status tracking
- Email-based workflows
- Paper-based evidence
Fragmented quality records leading to compliance gaps
Audit Execution
Jet Lens
- Template-driven audit system
- Scheduled audit instances
- Structured question responses
- Findings converted to discrepancies
Structured audit execution with traceable findings
Legacy Systems
- Spreadsheet-based audit tracking
- PDF audit forms
- Manual finding compilation
- Separate discrepancy creation
Manual audit processes with limited traceability
Training Compliance
Jet Lens
- Training requirements by team or authorization
- Certificate upload and storage
- Expiration tracking and alerts
- Personnel compliance snapshots
Automated training compliance tracking
Legacy Systems
- Manual training tracking
- Spreadsheet-based records
- Manual expiration checks
- Separate certificate storage
Time-consuming manual tracking with compliance risks
Multi-Tenant Access Control
Jet Lens
- Organization-scoped data isolation
- Role-based permissions per organization
- Multi-organization membership
- RLS enforced at database layer
Secure multi-tenant architecture with granular access control
Legacy Systems
- Shared user accounts
- Limited role differentiation
- Manual access management
- Application-level security only
Security risks from shared access and manual controls
Leave a note
If you're comparing systems right now, tell me what you're using and what keeps slipping. I'll reply personally.