JetLens
Log in
JetLens vs CAMP / Traxall

Legacy MMS was built for
a different era.

CAMP tracks work orders. Traxall manages documents. Neither was designed to tell you if your operation is actually under control right now.

See JetLens in actionSee the comparison

Real-time compliance status

CAMP doesn't have it

Unified quality + maintenance

Not in Traxall

Onboarding in days, not months

Neither can say this

Feature by feature

No cherry-picked categories. These are the exact questions operators ask when switching.

JetLens
CAMP / Traxall

AI assistant grounded in YOUR data (Chief)

Ask which tail is closest to grounding — streamed answers from your live due lists and obligations
No AI layer; answers live in someone's head or a report queue

AI document extraction (ADs, SBs, training packets)

Upload the PDF; obligations and certificates extract themselves, uncertain reads flagged for human review
Manual data entry from PDFs

AI repeat-finding detection

Recurring discrepancies grouped into systemic themes that feed the Safety Review Board
Repeat findings rediscovered by memory, if at all

AD/SB obligation tracking per aircraft

Per aircraft, per document, per hour/cycle threshold
Requires manual cross-referencing PDFs

Live compliance status (OVERDUE / DUE SOON / COMPLIANT)

Calculated against actual FH, FC, and calendar
No status engine — status is what you wrote in a spreadsheet

Discrepancy management with traceability

Open → Evidence → Corrective action → Closure chain
Exists, but findings and corrective actions often separate systems

Template-driven QA audits

Templates → Schedule → Execute → Convert findings to discrepancies
CAMP has some audit functionality; Traxall relies on manual forms

Training compliance per authorization

Requirements by team or authorization, certificate storage, expiration tracking
Separate system or spreadsheet — not integrated with quality ops

Authorization expiry tracking with renewal

RII / IA / Final Insp bucketed by 30/90 days; renew in two clicks; lapse audit trail
Authorizations live in HR spreadsheets — no expiry alerts, no audit trail

TPA roster reconciliation (DOT/Part 120, FlightLine)

Upload PDF; JetLens parses + matches personnel + reconciles against program predicate
Manual reconciliation against an Excel — typically skipped in busy months

Authorization prerequisite checks (expiry-aware)

Required training must be CURRENT; admin can override with regulator citation
No system check — relies on the granting admin remembering

Auditor packet (one-page PDF for inspectors)

Training, authorizations, findings, rosters, automation health on one page
Stitch three exports together by hand the night before

Safety Review Board with memory

Persistent snapshots, deltas since last board, signed minutes, action items that re-surface
Requires manual reporting or third-party BI tools

Modern web-native UX (no Citrix, no VPN, no desktop app)

Browser-native, mobile-ready, no install
Most legacy MMS platforms require desktop apps or VPN tunnels

Multi-tenant org isolation (RLS at database layer)

Each org isolated at DB level — no shared tables, no config risk
Application-level access controls only

Onboarding timeline

Days to first value, not months of implementation
3–6 month typical implementation, heavy IT dependency

Founder-direct support during onboarding

Direct access to the builder during Founding Operator Program
Ticket queues, account managers, professional services fees

The problem isn't features. It's the model.

CAMP and Traxall were designed in an era when compliance meant paperwork. They digitized paper. JetLens was built to answer a different question:

"Is my operation actually under control right now — or does it just look that way?"

Legacy platforms can tell you what maintenance is scheduled. They can't tell you whether a finding from your last audit is actually resolved or just marked closed. They can't show you which technicians' authorizations expire next month. They have no concept of obligation-level compliance status per aircraft.

What you actually need to know

Which ADs are due in the next 90 days — across every aircraft, calculated from actual hours and cycles
Which discrepancies are open, what the corrective action is, and who owns it
Which personnel have lapsed authorizations or expiring training
A single dashboard your accountable manager can look at before a regulatory visit

None of this requires a 6-month implementation. JetLens operators are running live within days.

Comparing systems right now?

Tell me what you're using and what keeps slipping. I'll reply personally and tell you honestly if JetLens is the right fit.

No pitch. No demo script. Direct reply from the founder.

1–3 sentences is enough.